The two logics P This section can be omitted without losing anything you will need later on in the book. And changes in logic are not wholly unrelated to it. Kierkegaard’s Socratic Point of View. The effort fails and moreover makes himself and the Church seem grasping and on a shaky foundat It’s quite the push. First, one must define the terms to see whether they are clear or ambiguous. This section can be omitted without losing anything you will need later on in the book.

Uploader: Kigahn
Date Added: 18 December 2016
File Size: 22.25 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 53978
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

That said though, this is a very good book for demonstrating all the mechanization and tortured logic needed when religious apologetic writings of any stripe try validate faith with logic and science. For Aristotelian logic is the logic of the four most basic verbal communication arts: Jun 20, Thomas Achord rated it it was amazing Shelves: Peter Kreeft provides an introductory textbook on the argumentative logic of Socrates in his book Socratic Logic.

To put it more succinctly, Faith needs logic like socratic logic peter kreeft fish needs a bicycle. Having met some of these people at MIT, I must admit that their self-description sometimes seems quite accurate.

Ethics & Socratic Logic

Modern symbolic logic is mathematical logic. First, one must define the terms to see whether they are clear or ambiguous. Mary Capricio rated it it was amazing Dec 22, socratic logic peter kreeft But logic should be a human instrument; logic was made for llogic, not man for logic. There’s a problem loading this menu right now. If a person is looking ssocratic an easy read, this book is not for you.


Inductive reasoning could be very roughly and inadequately defined as reasoning from concrete particular instances, known by experience, while deduction reasons from general principles.

In fact, it should be taught to everyone because our society lacks logic in myriad ways. There are at least three reasons for this change:. The wonderful thing I encounter in this book is the recovery of the Socratic elenchus – the positing of intu This book was recommended by a colleague. All these are good books, but Socratic Logic is in a league of its own. But they do not themselves constitute critical thinking. Should socratic logic peter kreeft think you are a capable, and perhaps even above average, reasoner, you may, as I have, discover you have a lot to learn.

A good text on classical logic for those of us who view Russell and Whithead’s attempt at convereting Socratuc Algebra into linguistic analysis as catastophic.

Socratic Logic

Read, highlight, and take notes, across web, tablet, and phone. Conveniently, the book also features a differentiation where one can find the basic sections B and the philosophical sections P marked in the table of contents.

Appleton-Century Crofts,p.

Peter John Kreeft Boston College. The appropriate goal is not to become an argumentative bully; it is, rather, to combine critical thinking abilities with compassion, kindness, and reflection in a way that is beneficial to ourselves, our intimates, and all those with whom we come in contact.

Instead, we think about how we feel about things, about how we can use them, how we see them behave, how they work, how we can change them, or how we can predict and control kreett behavior by technology. The third section of Socratic Logic focuses socratic logic peter kreeft the third test for logical accuracy which involves testing the argument for validity.


– Ethics & Socratic Logic

How many are from conversations you could have had in real life? I have found that students who are well trained in Aristotelian logic are much better at arguing, and at understanding arguments, than students who are trained only in symbolic logic.

Bayerly, in A Primer of Logic. This provides excellent structure and imprints the fundamentals upon the reader’s mind. But if one did not care to learn the information, then why read it in the first place? If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support? His ideas draw heavily from religious and philosophical tradition, Peter Kreeft is a Catholic apologist, professor of philosophy at Boston College and The King’s College, and author of over 45 books including Socratic logic peter kreeft of the FaithEverything you Ever Wanted to Know about Heavenand Back to Virtue.

It is reducible to mathematics. Socratic logic peter kreeft don’t share many of the authors philosophic views which tend to derail the discussion.